|
Post by Chris on Oct 16, 2007 11:34:15 GMT -8
Yeah crash is crazy like a fox. All he did was win the city last year. Of course it could have been dumb luck.
|
|
|
Post by trevor9 on Oct 16, 2007 13:42:58 GMT -8
Let's not give Crash too much credit.....he does enough of that himself. I was there for those practices and games. Brent Allen and Rick Evans handled the Cubbies while Crash was over on the other field telling his beloved Rangers to take a knee.
|
|
|
Post by Randy Edwards on Oct 16, 2007 14:18:15 GMT -8
OK OK.....LMAO...... It had to be blind luck.....the Padres should have won it ALL....Damn this game of baseball, any given team on any given day
|
|
|
Post by Greenie on Oct 16, 2007 15:23:22 GMT -8
Padres my arse.. The Dodgers had the best 1-5 in Turlock. What did that get them? It's too bad the Skipper didn't take Crash's lead and let his coaches run the show .
|
|
|
Post by crash23 on Oct 17, 2007 6:42:47 GMT -8
Crash asked my opinion and went in another direction last year. The player I suggested will be a huge factor in the Angels line-up this year and Crash's pick may not even play this year. Good call "Skipper" hehehehe. It's starting to get old being right all of the time. What? Trev isn't gonna play this year?
|
|
|
Post by Greenie on Oct 17, 2007 7:54:10 GMT -8
Mr. MVP is too big for Little League. I heard Mikey is putting his undefeated fall ball team back together and they are going to be hitting the road next season. That is if he gets permission first .
|
|
|
Post by Randy Edwards on Oct 17, 2007 9:01:11 GMT -8
LOL....Mike needs no permission.....I gave him some rubber tape to wrap around the shock collar....
|
|
|
Post by trevor9 on Oct 17, 2007 12:43:11 GMT -8
Trevor will be playing LL next year, I was talking about another player. I just hope Crash doesn't screw up all of Tony and Kalani's hard work with Trev. I was a little concerned seeing the Renegades take a knee at practice last night. I hope that is the only Cumberlanism I see this year.
|
|
|
Post by mflema on Oct 29, 2007 13:34:10 GMT -8
T9 -- Damn am I familar with that emotion. LOL. Each league will do it differently. There are a lot of ways to expand teams in the majors. I have always be partial to doing it this way. To expand the new team with the same amount of players that is the avg. of players that the existing teams have coming back. IE: If the existing teams have a avg. of 5 players each coming back, then that is how many the expansion teams starts off with. They will get to pick from the 11's and 12's but no younger players. We learned that the hard way when we had expansion teams only take the youngest players and then the existing teams had no future players for a couple of years. You have a supplemental draft for the expansion teams, then have the regular draft with the expansion teams drafting first. Hopefully you only expand one team a year and this is not to much of a hardship. This has been how Tony and I have seen it work the fairest. This way players with a loyalty to one team is not put back into a draft system, parents are not upset with having to move teams. Now if you have to expand more then one team, maybe throwing everyone back into a draft would work, but we think the less disruption the better. For instance, disbanding a team you should always use the team with the less returning players. Less disruption for everyone. The less disruption in expansion or disbanding is the most important to the players.
MEL
|
|